[Nut-upsdev] ups.firmware
Peter Selinger
selinger at mathstat.dal.ca
Thu Aug 24 16:58:19 UTC 2006
Kjell Claesson wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> As the subject has come up. Powerware ups may contain
> several cpu's and different firmware versions.
>
> Five of them is always ordered in a specific way.
>
> 1 control panel
> 2 inverter
> 3 rectifier
> 4 net interface card
> 5 display control
>
> So if a ups have a inverter cpu but not a control panel
> it sets the firmware revision to 00.00 to the control
> panel cpu, and get the version for the inverter.
>
> At the moment the driver is fetching the first version it
> find. And if it have a control panel it set ups.firmware
> to the version of that.
>
> One buggy thing is that if the ups is missing control panel
> it may give the firmware version of the communication board,
> as it skips the firmware with revision 00.00.
>
> So it would be nice with
>
> ups.control.firmware
> ups.inverter.firmware
> ups.rectifier.firmware
> ups.interface.firmware
> ups.display.firmware
Surely this would be more logical:
ups.firmware.control
ups.firmware.inverter
ups.firmware.rectifier
ups.firmware.interface
ups.firmware.display
Another possibility is to let the driver construct a compound firmware
string. How about ups.firmware = 'c:00.01 i:01.10 r:02.00 n:00.10
d:02.00'? The firmware variable is an opaque string anyway, and as
far as I know, there is no restriction on its formatting. Is there a
reason why the driver shouldn't synthesize this string?
> Is this something that may apply to other ups'es then powerware ?
There is already a variable ups.firmware.aux, which is used by some
drivers.
-- Peter
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list