[Nut-upsdev] 2.4.2 freeze
clepple at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 23:57:12 UTC 2010
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> 2010/2/12 Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org>:
>> Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>:
>>> If nobody objects within 24 hours, I will tag and release 2.4.2-
>> Do we really need tags for this? In recent history, we have seen
>> little to
>> no responses to the -pre releases. Can't we just direct people to a
>> SVN revision? Or even better, provide them with a link to a tarball
>> they can use?
> that makes sense! I'll reserve tags for final release.
> from now on, the "-pre" cycle will only consist in freezing for a
> as usual, this is limited to non invasive changes.
> having a symlink to the latest buildbot tarball would help.
> @Charles: can you please recall me the situation on that point?
It really should be a redirect rather than a symlink, so that the
filename reflects the revision. I haven't had time to look into
On the other hand, the whole purpose of a freeze is to test a specific
version, so I think it makes sense to say "test the tarball at this
Using the '[help]' link at the bottom of the waterfall, it is possible
to customize the list of builds. The following URL limits the list to
trunk builds with tarballs:
More information about the Nut-upsdev