[Nut-upsdev] On ups.status CHRG/DISCHRG Vs battery.charger.status

Charles Lepple clepple at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 23:44:19 UTC 2015

On Mar 25, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote:

> 1) Keep the legacy CHRG / DISCHRG status bits for ups.status, along with the complementary ones for battery.charger.status. And advocate (document) for the use of / switch to the latter, that is more suitable for publishing such information. All that with an impact on all the NUT driver, and a transition period to address that cleanly.

I prefer this option, for what it's worth. Let's not make ups.status more cluttered.

Charles Lepple
clepple at gmail

More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list