[Nut-upsdev] On ups.status CHRG/DISCHRG Vs battery.charger.status

[Charles Lepple]

On Mar 25, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote:

> 1) Keep the legacy CHRG / DISCHRG status bits for ups.status, along with the complementary ones for battery.charger.status. And advocate (document) for the use of / switch to the latter, that is more suitable for publishing such information. All that with an impact on all the NUT driver, and a transition period to address that cleanly.

I prefer this option, for what it's worth. Let's not make ups.status more cluttered.

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple at gmail