[Nut-upsdev] Re(2): [HCL]<Manufacturer>Powercom<Device>all ups<driver>usbhid-ups
Jim Klimov
jimklimov at gmail.com
Fri Oct 22 08:29:43 BST 2021
Thank you all for the constructive discussion, hope to refresh the web site
soon.
Jim
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, 04:34 dinow via Nut-upsdev <
nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
>
>
> Good Day Ted & Jim
>
>
>
>
>
> AA. Yes
>
>
>
> ==> Thanks your corrections and we hope nut to *keep* the old documents
>
>
>
> ==> Is it okay to change the representation as below *Powercom* list from
> https://networkupstools.org/ups-protocols.html
>
> - USB information for *old* BNT series
> - USB information for *old* IMPERIAL series
> - USB information for *old* SKP series
> - USB information for *old* WOW series
> - USB information for All Powercom UPS series (
> https://www.upspowercom.com/ftp/PCM-USB-Protocol.pdf)
>
>
>
> BB. *Big thanks* for all your professional corrections and assistance
>
>
>
>
>
> If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to inform us
>
> Sincerely yours truly, Oct. 21th
>
> Dinow Hsieh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From: *nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net>
> <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net>
> *To: *Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> <tedm at mittelstaedt.us>
> *Date: *2021/10/21 (週四)
> *Subject: *Re: [Nut-upsdev] [HCL]Powercomall upsusbhid-ups
>
> Thanks Ted,
>
> that echoes my thoughts: any HW supported by NUT at some point and with
> a population of units physically alive, whether marketed or supported by
> original vendors or not, should better be documented.
>
> So if the old docs are in some way better than new one, even if
> explaining quirks not relevant and not documented for same-named models or
> firmware sold today, I believe such docs should remain available (maybe
> marked as old stuff, but ready for revision). After all, currently shipped
> drivers probably correspond to that spec?..
>
> @Dinow: how strict is the business/etc. requirement to make that older
> info truly unavailable? Can we keep it visible but maybe marked deprecated?
>
> Jim
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021, 12:05 Ted Mittelstaedt via Nut-upsdev <
> nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks, Dinow,
>>
>>
>> I'm not a NUT admin but you posted this to a public mailing list so I'm
>> going to just send a response to that list since it's a public posting.
>>
>>
>> The current documentation you sent is much sparser than the older docs.
>> So I think the older docs are going to still be valuable for just that
>> reason alone, as an addition to the newer current documentation. I do not
>> know what the admins are going to do but I would hope they merely mark the
>> old documents as "Old" and add this to them.
>>
>>
>> Unlike commercial software, open source software projects usually do not
>> have the luxury of removing support for older hardware that is no longer in
>> production from the manufacturer.
>>
>>
>> As a NUT user I cannot thank you enough for supporting open source
>> software projects like NUT.
>>
>>
>> Ted
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/19/2021 7:28 PM, dinow via Nut-upsdev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Good Day NUT administrators
>>
>>
>>
>> AA. My name is Dinow and the engineer of *Powercom* corporation
>>
>>
>>
>> BB. Could you help us to :
>>
>>
>>
>> B1. *Remove* the current list from Powercom >>
>> https://networkupstools.org/ups-protocols.html:
>>
>> - USB information for BNT series
>> - USB information for IMPERIAL series
>> - USB information for SKP series
>> - USB information for WOW series
>>
>> B2. *Add* a item and its document
>>
>> - USB information for *all* Powercom's UPS
>> - Add attached *PDF* as its document
>>
>> CC. Big Thanks for your help
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to inform us
>>
>> Sincerely yours truly, Oct. 20th
>>
>> Dinow Hsieh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nut-upsdev mailing listNut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.nethttps://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nut-upsdev mailing list
>> Nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net
>> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
>>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail may be confidential; it is intended for use
> solely by the individual or entity named as the recipient hereof.
> Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail by
> persons other than the intended recipient may violate applicable laws and
> if you have received this e-mail in error, please delete the original
> message and notify us by collect call immediately. Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nut-upsdev mailing list
> Nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20211022/2397cca0/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list