[Nut-upsuser] Belkin 800VA Universal AVR doesn't warn about battery
gasper.kozak at gmail.com
Sun Jul 12 12:11:28 UTC 2009
Oh, the nut version in the packages is 2.4.1.
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Gasper Kozak <gasper.kozak at gmail.com>wrote:
> I've installed the mentioned packages and LB event still doesn't get
> Just to make sure, if values displayed with upsc are set to these values
> battery.charge: 75
> battery.charge.low: 30
> battery.charge.warning: 30
> Then the driver should report LB when battery.charge is below
> battery.charge.low (30)? What does battery.charge.warning have to do here?
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Gasper Kozak <gasper.kozak at gmail.com>wrote:
>> thanks, sort of what I expected. So it's very probable that it's driver's
>> fault for not receiving LB message, even though OL, OB, DISCHRG work well,
>> including when more than one is set.
>> I found the Centos packages I'm refering to here on the list:
>> This mailing list appears to be the only "official" source of information
>> about them. I'm having problems installing them, but I'm aware this is not
>> the place to ask about that -- I'll contact he packager directly. I just
>> wanted to make sure, whether my USP is supposed to report LB in status field
>> or not.
>> When I succeed in upgrading nut, I'll post the results here.
>> Thanks and best regards,
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+users at de-korte.org<nut%2Busers at de-korte.org>
>> > wrote:
>>> Citeren Gasper Kozak <gasper.kozak at gmail.com>:
>>> Since battery.charge.low and battery.charge.warning settings are
>>>> and LB doesn't get reported via ups.status, I'm guessing the latter two
>>>> these are just advisory -- rather silly, but I guess that's it. Maybe
>>>> should watch these as well?
>>> No. The very least a driver (UPS) should support are the OL, OB and LB
>>> flags. If this doesn't work, it's broken and can't be used reliably.
>>> I've bypassed this problem by writing my own monitor that triggers the
>>>> event and shuts down the somputer. The question is: did I miss something
>>> Yes, the upgrades that have been released since nut-2.2.0 came out
>>> (sorry, couldn't resist).
>>> Is it supposed to work this way?
>>> I'm using nut-2.2.0, which is an older version, so this may well be the
>>>> problem, but I'm on Centos and the only rpms I've found for 2.4 didn't
>>> The version you're using is over two years old and no longer supported.
>>> You need to upgrade to a more recent version before asking for help. With
>>> the sparse information you're providing here, we can't help you as to why
>>> the binaries you found don't work. You should also check with whoever
>>> packaged these RPMS first if you have problems installing them, before
>>> asking for help here.
>>> Best regards, Arjen
>>> Please keep list traffic on the list
>>> Nut-upsuser mailing list
>>> Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nut-upsuser