[Nut-upsuser] Fwd: Re: libusb_get_report: Unknown error

[Robert Ayrapetyan]

DDDDD output attached.

On 04/12/12 19:53, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>
>
> 2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <robert.ayrapetyan at gmail.com
> <mailto:robert.ayrapetyan at gmail.com>>
>
>     Seems I've missed confirmation mail somewhere, now registered.
>
>
>      > have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
>     I've used trunk + the patch.
>
>
>      > I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to
>      > see if we're still on the overflow side.
>
>     trunk (rev.3529) "with no patch" log attached.
>
>     Btw I've checked all logs I've sent so far - all of them contain:
>
>        1.199490     libusb_get_report: Unknown error
>        1.199512     Can't retrieve Report 0c: Input/output error
>
>     Seems you are talking about Dmitry's case (overflow).
>
>
> you're right: your issues are the same, but BSD doesn't report EOVERFLOW
> has it should.
> while Dmitry is running on Linux, the patch should work there.
>
> @Robert: could you please run the test again (with wathever version),
> using debug level 5 (-DDDDD) and doing "export USB_DEBUG=3" before
> launching the driver?
>
> if there is no way to catch overflow on BSD, I fear I'll have to create
> a driver option to bypass this...
>
> cheers,
> Arno
>
>
>
>     On 04/11/12 16:35, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>
>
>         2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <robert.ayrapetyan at gmail.com
>         <mailto:robert.ayrapetyan at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:robert.ayrapetyan at __gmail.com
>         <mailto:robert.ayrapetyan at gmail.com>>>
>
>
>             Hi.
>
>
>         Hi Robert,
>
>         please check your subscription.
>         I'm still told that you're not subscribed!
>
>             Mine output after patch looks same (attached).
>
>
>         in fact, it's different.
>         It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error!
>
>         have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
>         in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the
>         patch, to
>         see if we're still on the overflow side.
>
>             On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette
>         <aquette.dev at gmail.com <mailto:aquette.dev at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:aquette.dev at gmail.com <mailto:aquette.dev at gmail.com>>__>
>         wrote:
>          > Hi Robert and Dmitry,
>          >
>          > I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same
>             EOVERFLOW
>          > issue.
>          >
>          > @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the
>             libusb.c part
>          > :-/
>          >
>          > to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
>          > please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.
>          >
>          > I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's "blind
>             coded" (Ie,
>          > just compiled, not tested with HW)
>          >
>          > cheers,
>          > Arnaud
>
>
>         cheers,
>         Arnaud
>         --
>         Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
>         Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader -
>         http://www.networkupstools.__org/ <http://www.networkupstools.org/>
>         Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
>         Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DDDDD.txt.7z
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7499 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20120416/d08db020/attachment.obj>