[Nut-upsuser] Does NUT include support for older UPSD servers?
David H. Durgee
dhdurgee at comcast.net
Wed Dec 5 20:13:12 UTC 2012
Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:17 PM, David H. Durgee wrote:
>> I have a network with two older systems protected by APC UPSs. Both systems run OS/2 and will continue to do so. Both systems have APC PowerChute Plus 4.2.3 installed and I can use that software to monitor and control both systems.
>> I am also now running several linux systems, in fact I spend almost all my time on the linux systems and these OS/2 systems are servers running in the background which need to be protected. Thus I would like to be able to monitor the UPSs connected to the OS/2 systems from a linux system. Unfortunately that appears to be problematic. The PCP 4.x software appears to use Lan Server for its network protocol while the later APC software uses TCP/IP for networking. The Windows/WfWG version of 4.x lacks network support. The linux version of 4.x is not binary compatible with modern linux systems and is closed source.
> So if I understand correctly, it is not possible to run the later PowerChute Plus software (that supports TCP/IP) on the OS/2 systems?
I have asked this on the APC forums and someone is looking to see if it
exists, but if it does it is not on their FTP site.
>> I have posted on the APC forums and they have had nothing further to suggest to me other than to check third-party software or run the OS/2 software in a virtual machine. Given this, I am posting this to ask if there is backward compatibility in your package that would permit me to monitor my UPSs connected via the OS/2 UPSD 4.2.3 software. If not, I guess I will need to look elsewhere.
> I don't think NUT has support for talking to PowerChute (unless it is hiding under a different name), but if we were to develop something for it, we would probably only target the TCP/IP interface.
> If it is possible to get the OS/2 boxes to speak the PowerChute protocol over TCP, you might have some success with apcupsd:
> This is all speculation, however.
Another possibility is that I just found out that nut-2.4.3 was ported
to OS/2 using GCC 4.3.4, but it is on a restricted access server. This
might offer another solution, but then I need to have nut do the same
thing PC+ is doing on the OS/2 systems. One of these systems has a
P/370 card and there are Rexx scripts run by the PC+ software to inform
the P/370 environment about power transitions to allow it to shut down
cleanly should it be necessary.
I am reluctant to change software on these systems, as they are stable
and functional, but this does offer another approach to the issue.
More information about the Nut-upsuser