[Nut-upsuser] This one's a head-scratcher.

[Roger Price]

On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> Simon Wilson via Nut-upsuser writes:
>> I'm just looking forward to a set of RH/Fedora packages which are not 
>> borked out of the box.
>
> I'm not sure what's going on with that. Looking through that package, it was 
> built back in September, long before Fedora 37 was released. It never worked, 
> from the looks of it, but, so far, there's been no activity in the bug.
>
> And even now, weeks after a Fedora release, that bug is not blowing up with 
> everyone, and their uncle, complaining that nut is completely non-functional? 
> So, what, there are less than a dozen people out there who are using Fedora 
> and a non-APC UPS, for which nut is, pretty much, the only option?
>
> This one's a head-scratcher.

I wonder what percentage of Linux users have a UPS?  I suspect the figure is 
real low.  Most people trust their public power supply, and live in an area with 
little lightning.  Why spend the money?

Until of course some backhoe specialist finds the cable and data gets lost.

Roger