SQlite backend series updated

[Nicolas Sebrecht]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 04:31:49PM +0200, Vincent Beffara wrote:
> 
> > P.P.S. Sometimes I would love to have a --dry-run feature that would
> > tell me what it would sync on a run. I am not sure how easy it would
> > be to implement, but is that something others could be interested in
> > as well?
> 
> That would be reassuring for testing out new features ... Couldn't it be
> emulated by setting both ends to be read-only ? [I haven't looked at
> the way you implement read-only, but if it is low-level enough in the
> process, it would be very close to --dry-run or at least combinable with
> it. I mean, dry-run == read-only and verbose.]
> 
> Am I completely off ?

Please, don't cull the cc list.

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht