Another stack trace

Sebastian Spaeth Sebastian at
Tue Sep 27 13:15:24 BST 2011

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:17:23 -0400, Dave Abrahams <dave at> wrote:
> FWIW, I think what we were seeing was Python's response to the process
> being SIGKILLed, which I do periodically to get it to start a fresh
> sync.  It'd be nice if the process would respond to SIGHUP, though :-)

I think what you want it to use the SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 signals to start
a new round of syncs?!

And no, I am not too fond of the choice of signals. SIGHUP and/or
SIGCONT would make a lot more sense to start a new round of refresh
runs, IMHO.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the OfflineIMAP-project mailing list