Another stack trace
dave at boostpro.com
Tue Sep 27 14:21:03 BST 2011
on Tue Sep 27 2011, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian-AT-SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:17:23 -0400, Dave Abrahams <dave at boostpro.com> wrote:
>> FWIW, I think what we were seeing was Python's response to the process
>> being SIGKILLed, which I do periodically to get it to start a fresh
>> sync. It'd be nice if the process would respond to SIGHUP, though :-)
> I think what you want it to use the SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 signals to start
> a new round of syncs?!
Do you mean that those signals will start a new round of syncs today, or
that you think I should be asking for something other than SIGHUP,
> And no, I am not too fond of the choice of signals. SIGHUP and/or
> SIGCONT would make a lot more sense to start a new round of refresh
> runs, IMHO.
What's the difference between a refresh run and a sync?
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project