State of IMAP<->IMAP sync.

[Peter Lewis]

Hi all,

Thanks for the replies everyone.

Erik, I just went through the thread from your patch. It sounds like it
would be very useful (required?) for IMAP <-> IMAP to be considered
complete. It also seems like some progress was made in that thread on
how to achieve it.

I'd love it if you could pick that up again and get it into mainline.

Let me know if I can help with testing.

Pete.



On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, chris coleman wrote:


> Eric, your patch to keep all keywords (flags) sounds good- and I agree- OI shouldn't drop keywords except the subset that it uses- the proper, non-presumptuous way would be like your patch does, to keep all keywords. One vote from me in favor.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:05 AM, Erik Quaeghebeur <offlineimap at equaeghe.nospammail.net> wrote:
>  
> >> What is the state / risk of using IMAP<->IMAP sync these days?
> 
> I've only used it for testing purposes myself, but perhaps my 2013-03-10 
> patch posted to this group may be of interest: it ensures that all IMAP 
> keywords are synced, not only those IMAP flags (predefined keywords) 
> that map to Maildir flags, but also user-defined ones.
> 
> If there's sufficient interest in it, I'll try to get into the mainline 
> by generating a pull request on github.
> 
> 
> Erik
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OfflineIMAP-project mailing list
> OfflineIMAP-project at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/offlineimap-project
> 
> OfflineIMAP homepage: http://software.complete.org/offlineimap

> _______________________________________________
> OfflineIMAP-project mailing list
> OfflineIMAP-project at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/offlineimap-project
> 
> OfflineIMAP homepage: http://software.complete.org/offlineimap