[pkg-bacula-devel] Fw: [pkg-bacula-commits] [SCM] Bacula, a network backup, recovery and verification program annotated tag, debian/5.2.6+dfsg-3, created. debian/5.2.6+dfsg-3

[Luca Capello]

Hi there!

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:00:14 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> I test packages as i can and think, that they can be uploaded into sid.

Are these targeted at wheezy?  If not, then the upload should go to
experimental.  And given the RM's replies I guess such an upload with a
lot of changes will never be accepted:

  <http://lists.debian.org/544c11ef5cd91251187cea92d7bd92e8@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>

> Binary packages, tested by me, can be given from vasks.debian.org
> in /srv/home/users/alexandro-guest/5.2.6+dfsg-3/ directory.

This is not a good option if you want other people to test them, given
that you need an Alioth login plus SSH keys to access vasks.  It would
be better to put them in wagner.d.o:/home/groups/pkg-bacula/htdocs/tmp/
or similar (NB, wagner is alioth.d.o), i.e. on the webspace at:

  <http://pkg-bacula.alioth.debian.org/tmp/>

> Luca, Bart, of course will be great, if you can test packages too.

Sure, but please note the following...

> The annotated tag, debian/5.2.6+dfsg-3 has been created
>         at  5876face9ed686975ab83928d05034f569cfb983 (tag)
>    tagging  e1d5e778a019642b04f406db4438f7e0c5768f00 (commit)
>   replaces  debian/5.2.6+dfsg-2
>  tagged by  Alexander Golovko
>         on  Thu Aug 9 10:55:24 2012 +0400
[...]
> Alexander Golovko (33):
>       Fix pid_dir and daemons user/group for systemd
>       Fix make_mysql_tables and update_mysql_tables
>       fix bad bacula-director passwords in old packages
>       suppress userdel errors output (thanks to ubuntu)

I forgot to check this comment, but why do we want to suppress errors?

>       Don't remove bacula user on package purging

This should "invalidate" userdel above, right?

>       force /etc/defaults/bacula-dir ucf reregistration.

Mmm, I would not do any ucf migration in wheezy, it should be heavily
tested before having it on production.  This is what I was telling you
on XMPP with "we should work on the ucf stuff on a separate branch".

>       one-pass build instead of each dbtype separate.

I completely agree with this one for wheezy, but again it depends on the
RM's opinion.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20120810/661d9e8c/attachment.pgp>