[pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#658326: Bug#658326: patch for switch to openssl SHA1 implementation

Luca Capello luca at pca.it
Thu May 17 16:05:49 UTC 2012


Hi Alexander!

On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:43:12 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:48:25 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:06:25 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
>>> Fortunally, there are SHA1 implementation in openssl library.
>>> Used functions have the same names and arguments and bacula already
>>> linked with libssl
>>>
>>> We need only change headers, makefile.in and remove bad files.
>>
>> Thank you, forwarded upstream to:
>>
>>   <http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1869>
>>
>
> I'm afraid, this patch can't be merged into upstream without changes,
> because bacula can be built without SSL support, but with SHA1.
> But it will be greate if we will not need to support it always.

For the time being (the upstream BTS shows some discussion) I will
simply apply your patch and "forget" that we can build Bacula without
SSL support but with SHA-1, given that Debian does not provide such
packages.

> Ok, i add it into master branch
> <http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c562cfdaffd730c796518233f0d97da08a3891b>

While the patch is perfectly fine, we should completely remove the two
offending files from the upstream sources as well.  Unfortunately, the
DFSG-free .orig.tar.gz Kefu uploaded still contains them:

  <http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula/news/20120430T091734Z.html>

I am going to upload a fixed package this weekend.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20120517/22faa248/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list