[pkg-bacula-devel] squeeze backport for bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-7

Alexander Golovko alexandro at ankalagon.ru
Mon Jan 21 11:21:44 UTC 2013

В Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:48:02 +0000
Bart Swedrowski <bart at timedout.org> пишет:

> On 21 January 2013 10:44, Hilko Bengen <bengen at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > I just noticed that the build-dependencies had been changed for
> > 5.2.6+dfsg-1~bpo60+1. I did not actually need to change anything
> > for my build because newer versions of debhelper and libpq-dev are
> > in squeeze-backports now. Is it okay to just use the
> > build-dependencies from the wheezy version?
> Not 100% sure about this one but I'd prefer to stick to
> build-dependencies compatible with squeeze-backports.  Alexandro,
> could you comment?

If we will use libpq-dev from squeeze-backports at build-time, there
will be run-time dependency from new libpq? I think, that result binary
packages should depend from other backported packages as few as

with best regards,
Alexander Golovko
email: alexandro at ankalagon.ru
xmpp: alexandro at ankalagon.ru
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20130121/98239637/attachment.pgp>

More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list