[pkg-bacula-devel] squeeze backport for bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-7
bengen at debian.org
Mon Jan 21 11:34:41 UTC 2013
* Alexander Golovko:
> В Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:48:02 +0000
> Bart Swedrowski <bart at timedout.org> пишет:
>> On 21 January 2013 10:44, Hilko Bengen <bengen at debian.org> wrote:
>> > I just noticed that the build-dependencies had been changed for
>> > 5.2.6+dfsg-1~bpo60+1. I did not actually need to change anything
>> > for my build because newer versions of debhelper and libpq-dev are
>> > in squeeze-backports now. Is it okay to just use the
>> > build-dependencies from the wheezy version?
>> Not 100% sure about this one but I'd prefer to stick to
>> build-dependencies compatible with squeeze-backports. Alexandro,
>> could you comment?
> If we will use libpq-dev from squeeze-backports at build-time, there
> will be run-time dependency from new libpq?
Not according to my sbuild log:
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 148730 bytes: control archive=871 bytes.
723 bytes, 18 lines control
478 bytes, 6 lines md5sums
73 bytes, 2 lines shlibs
Maintainer: Debian Bacula Team <pkg-bacula-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
Depends: bacula-common, libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libpq5, libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1)
Conflicts: bacula-common-mysql, bacula-common-sqlite3
Description: network backup service - PostgreSQL common files
Bacula is a set of programs to manage backup, recovery, and verification of
data across a network of computers of different kinds.
This package provides files that are useful for other Bacula packages
for the PostgreSQL database.
> I think, that result binary packages should depend from other
> backported packages as few as possible.
It doesn't matter for the current situation, but I agree with that
Expect a patch within a few hours.
More information about the pkg-bacula-devel