[pkg-bacula-devel] squeeze backport for bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-7

Hilko Bengen bengen at debian.org
Mon Jan 21 11:34:41 UTC 2013


* Alexander Golovko:

> В Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:48:02 +0000
> Bart Swedrowski <bart at timedout.org> пишет:
>
>> On 21 January 2013 10:44, Hilko Bengen <bengen at debian.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I just noticed that the build-dependencies had been changed for
>> > 5.2.6+dfsg-1~bpo60+1. I did not actually need to change anything
>> > for my build because newer versions of debhelper and libpq-dev are
>> > in squeeze-backports now. Is it okay to just use the
>> > build-dependencies from the wheezy version?
>> 
>> Not 100% sure about this one but I'd prefer to stick to
>> build-dependencies compatible with squeeze-backports.  Alexandro,
>> could you comment?
>
> If we will use libpq-dev from squeeze-backports at build-time, there
> will be run-time dependency from new libpq?

Not according to my sbuild log:

bacula-common-pgsql_5.2.6+dfsg-7~bpo60+1_amd64.deb
──────────────────────────────────────────────────

 new debian package, version 2.0.
 size 148730 bytes: control archive=871 bytes.
     723 bytes,    18 lines      control              
     478 bytes,     6 lines      md5sums              
      73 bytes,     2 lines      shlibs               
 Package: bacula-common-pgsql
 Source: bacula
 Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-7~bpo60+1
 Architecture: amd64
 Maintainer: Debian Bacula Team <pkg-bacula-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
 Installed-Size: 320
 Depends: bacula-common, libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libpq5, libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1)
 Suggests: bacula-doc
 Conflicts: bacula-common-mysql, bacula-common-sqlite3
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
 Homepage: http://www.bacula.org/
 Description: network backup service - PostgreSQL common files
  Bacula is a set of programs to manage backup, recovery, and verification of
  data across a network of computers of different kinds.
  .
  This package provides files that are useful for other Bacula packages
  for the PostgreSQL database.

> I think, that result binary packages should depend from other
> backported packages as few as possible.

It doesn't matter for the current situation, but I agree with that
principle.

Expect a patch within a few hours.

Cheers,
-Hilko



More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list