[pkg-bacula-devel] Next steps

[Sven Hartge]

On 19.10.2016 23:46, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:

>> I think this is overengineered. If the file already belongs to bacula
>> then no harm is done chowning it again. Just less code that can break, IMHO.
> 
> as you've probably already seen, the simple version went in now and is
> on it's way to experimental.

Yes, I saw. Now to wait until piuparts again detects something broken I
overlooked.

Grüße,
Sven.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20161020/1be155a0/attachment.sig>