[Pkg-bazaar-maint] bzr-explorer fro Debian

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:38 -0600, Andrew SB wrote: 
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Andrew SB <a.starr.b at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 19:08 -0500, Andrew SB wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Andrew,
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 11:43 -0500, Andrew SB wrote:
> >>> >> I've recently opened an ITP for bzr-explorer
> >>> >> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554034>.
> >>>
> >>> > There isn't any team documentation, but we follow procedures similar to
> >>> > those of many other teams in Debian. Please request membership for the
> >>> > pkg-bazaar-maint project on alioth.
> >>> I just requested it. Do you have any team guidelines for the branch
> >>> style? My current work only keeps the debian dir. The upstream source
> >>> is grabbed from the watch file with "bzr bd" From a quick browsing, it
> >>> seems like most packages have the full upstream source.
> >> Yes, we do indeed use full source branches - it would be nice if
> >> bzr-explorer could be consistent in that regard.
> >
> > I have a full source branch prepped and ready to push as soon as
> > someone approves me on alioth. My username there is
> > andrewsomething-guest.
> 
> I was accepted and have pushed a full source branch to:
> http://bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-bazaar/bzr-explorer/unstable
Sorry for taking so long. I think the package is almost ready for
uploading, but could you please have a look at the following issues:

Could you perhaps submit the bzr-explorer.desktop upstream as well and
patch the original desktop file rather than adding a new one?

You probably don't need shlibs:Depends or a dependency on pythn-dev
because bzr-explorer doesn't contain any C code that needs to be built.

The copyright file doesn't mention all the copyright holders.

Cheers,

Jelmer