[pymvpa] Change of repository layout

[Yaroslav Halchenko]

> maint/?.?
>   Upstream maintenance branches. Bugfixes and documentation enhancements
>   for the current ?.? release go here and will later on be released as
>   ?.?.? minor releases.
I am not clear on what would be a destiny of this one... bug fixes
usually go into some master and later cherry picked or just merged into
main master...

>   For releases in Debian proper we would usually only have a
>   'dist/debian/proper/sid' branch that contains the most recent upstream
may be better to have dist/debian/{etch,sid}/{bp,proper} ? ie flip two
levels?

>   For simplicity I would simply put stuff like 'hardy' and 'gutsy' under
>   'dist/debian/bp/' as well. There is not really a differences wrt
>   the environment.
agree... especially since ubuntu people might introduce their
'improvement' changes (ie changes of maintainer and adding 'support' for
python 100.0 prior to its release), so our ubuntu packaging would
diverge from theirs

> Morever, IMHO we can keep the current tag scheme: upstream/<version> for
> upstream releases and debian/<debian_version> for Debian packages.
how do we tag release/backport specific tags? add it into the version
string?

-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik