[pymvpa] Suspicious results

Nynke van der Laan nynkevanderlaan at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 12:59:27 UTC 2011


Hello all,
I've used the toolbox to analyze my data and I get kind of strange results.
What I did is the following: I did a searchlight analysis (radius 10
mm), with the classifier RbfNuSVMC on the whole brain (with a whole
brain mask). I used a NFoldCrossvalidation (no detrending or
z-scoring).
I use two stimuluscategories. The task I used consisted of 38 chunks
(38 trials) with in each chunk two stimuluspresentations (one of each
category). I have used blockaveraging to reduce features.
My results are in the form of 3-d accuracymaps (i.e., for each voxel I
have the mean True pos + true neg / total over the crossvalidation).
Because I have two stimuluscategories the chance level accuracy would
thus be 0.5
What I get as results is that almost all voxels have an accuracy above
0.5 and the highest accuracies I got were around 0.7 (i.e., 70%
correctly classified) So this would mean that there is predictive
information in all regions of the brain.. Also, when I put all the
single subject results into a group analysis I find that all brain
regions predict above 50% accuracy.
The highest peaks are located at the borders of the brain.
My question is: Are these results possibly correct? Is it possible
that all brain areas are predictive? Or is there something strange
going on? (overfitting maybe?)
Best regards, Nynke van der Laan



More information about the Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list