[pymvpa] Q: Time-offset of category labels in Haxby 2001 dataset. Was this ever properly resolved?

[Yaroslav Halchenko]

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Rajeev Raizada wrote:
> It would definitely be worth adding to the docs and README.txt
> a statement saying that the labels do not require any additional time-offset,
> such that any TR with the label, e.g. "shoes", attached to it
> can be understood as containing evoked-HRF responses to shoes.
> (Just saying "the labels do not require any additional time-offset",
> but without any further explanation, might not be clear to readers
> who have not seen this discussion in the list-archives).

would you mind sending a patch (or modified version) with your wording
for
http://data.pymvpa.org/datasets/haxby2001/README.rst
?

or may be even -- creating your clone of PyMVPA on github, getting it
locally, changing doc/source/datadb/haxby2001.rst, committing, pushing
and submitting 'pull request' so we would simply merge it

Although lengthier process to start but
- you will bare the authorship for this contribution as the committer
- it would streamline any future changes you might like to introduce
  into PyMVPA

> Another piece of info that can be gleaned from this list's archives
> but which is also currently not in the docs is that the 9th run of subj5
> contains only the label "rest", due to excessive head motion on that run.

We have updated README.rst some time ago but somehow update was
overriden... I have reuploaded updated version with the note on 9th run
of subj5

> Thanks again for putting this dataset online,
> and for your input on helping to clarify the labels issue.

you are welcome!
-- 
=------------------------------------------------------------------=
Keep in touch                                     www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko                 www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic