[Pkg-games-devel] Re: Debian Games Team

[Joey Hess]

Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >    I'm not a huge fan of subversion, or revision control for debian
> >   packages.  Since mostly the debian/ subdirectory doesn't change much
> >   and you're essentially importing the new game releases for every
> >   new upstream release.
> > 
> >    Still if thats what it took .. I guess I'd go for it.
> 
> I've been using svn a lot recently for software development and I find it very
> useful. I also have good references for its usage from the KDE development
> team, so I think it would be a great idea to use it.

I've been using svn and before that cve for maintaining debian packages
for something like 7 years. Checking the whole package in and
maintaining it that way ends up saving several annoyances, and for
collaborative maintenance I've had good experiences with svn for the d-i
group.

> I totally agree with you in this point. I'm just not really sure right now how
> to handle this. If anyone has experience in a case like this, it would be
> great to know the possible problems before designing the system.

I don't understand what problem you're trying to solve; there is no need
for gpg keys besides the one each DD already has, and there is no sane
way to set up a shared gpg key anyway.

-- 
see shy jo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20060116/339586fb/attachment.pgp