Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated
Josselin Mouette
joss at debian.org
Wed Jan 27 16:56:17 UTC 2010
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 17:04 +0100, Piotr Pokora a écrit :
> Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream
> release,
> which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself.
>
> Attaching debian files patch.
Thanks for your proposal for help. Unfortunately there are several
issues with this patch.
> -Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.41),
> +Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.65),
Why the change?
> - libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.16),
> + libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.22),
This is incorrect. The libgda4 tarball requests (in configure.in) only
version 2.16.
> - libxml2-dev (>= 2.4.22),
> + libxml2-dev (>= 2.7.3),
Same here. Why bump this dependency?
> + * Added nmu to debian version. Fixes: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number
Please don’t do that, this is not going to be a NMU.
> libgda4 (4.0.4-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
You should have merged the changelog entries here instead of adding a
new one.
Please consider adding the following to your ~/.devscripts:
DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog
DEBCHANGE_FORCE_SAVE_ON_RELEASE=no
This will make the dch command work as expected in most cases.
> GNOME_MODULE := libgda
> -SONAME := 4
> +SONAME := 6
This change is incorrect. The soname was not changed between the two
versions so the package name must not change.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20100127/fe6b0620/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list