pd-iemlib: request for review/sponsoring

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 2013-11-29 14:21, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:22 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
>> On 2013-11-21 22:10, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>> hi fellow packagers,
>>>
>>
>> any takers for reviewing pd-iemlib?
> 
> Sorry, missed this.
> 
> - Any particular reason you want to duplicate the pd cdbs snippet in
> this rules file?

the only reason is, that the package doesn't use cdbs...
if need be, i can switch the packaging system from dh to cdbs.

> - I don't see the source for Dokumentation_German.pdf

me neither.
i will ask upstream.

> - You license debian/* as GPL-3, and because you have one patch this
> might render the whole package GPL-3. I don't think that is intended.
> Probably you should license at least debian/patches/* as LGPL

oh indeed, this is unintended.
fixed.


> - The delay resulted in a new Standards-Version being available :(.
> Please update this too.

are you sure?
i already followed 3.9.5, and i haven't found 3.9.6 anywhere...



vmasf
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 897 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20131129/b06ff25f/attachment.sig>