[Pkg-puppet-devel] Are we ok with the state of 0.25.0 ?

[Micah Anderson]

* Nigel Kersten <nigel at explanatorygap.net> [2009-09-25 19:29-0400]:
> I'd like to get a package uploaded (andy pollock said he'd sponsor it)
> for 0.25.0, particularly given 0.25.1 is about to be released....
> 
> Are we ok with the current status? git-buildpackage is working which is cool.

I haven't been able to deploy this in my environment, but I did build
and install the package and it seemed good.

Would it be better to wait for 0.25.1 before pushing it out? I'm not
suggesting we should, just wondering.

> The only major change I can think of that we haven't included is
> moving to using the vendor_ruby directory instead. I'm unsure about
> that myself, and I'll go digging into the relevant policies now to see
> how strong that policy is.

Considering puppet itself doesn't work with ruby1.9, I dont think it
should be put there. My understanding is that location was only meant
for things that worked with both 1.8 and 1.9. Then again, the policy
discussions that I found about it were pretty thin and when I spoke with
Lucas at Debconf, it was somewhat in question again, so I would say this
shouldn't be done before pushing it out.

m
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-puppet-devel/attachments/20090925/dcddf68e/attachment.pgp>