[DRE-maint] Lenny release team summary (important! read this!)
Paul van Tilburg
paulvt at debian.org
Sat Aug 16 12:36:51 UTC 2008
Hi!
This is a small update. I removed the parts that I flagged as "to be
ignored for now" in the previous summary.
Note that I am leaving for a conference with a few hours and I won't be
able to deal with the still pending tasks. Could someone take this job
upon himself? We need to have everything solved by the end of next week
IMO. I will be back August 25 and until then probably without internet
(it's not a hacker's conference ;)).
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> The summary (information gathered from QA report, PTS, BTS):
>
> | Newer upstream available (7)
> | libdb4.2-ruby 0.6.2-3 < 0.6.5
> | libdb4.3-ruby 0.6.2-2 < 0.6.5
> | libdb4.4-ruby 0.6.2-1 < 0.6.5
>
> Michael Schutte is working on it. The libdb-ruby is already on 0.6.5 in
> sid, not in testing just yet. These source pakages should be removed and
> libdb-ruby's libdbX.Y-ruby package should provide for a transition.
Status of this work? Anyone?
> | NEW and incoming (1)
> | libcairo-ruby S #487204 pending
>
> This bug, severity serious, has been fixed in 1.6.3. However, 1.5.1
> is in Lenny. I worked for months on the new upstream. I'd really like
> to have 1.6.3 in Lenny. If we cannot get the exeception, then we have
> a 1.5.1+bugfix in the branches.
The 1.6.3 upstream is in Sid now. A release block exception should
be requested.
> | Ready for upload (1)
> | libgd-ruby I #472438 svn-released:pending
>
> All fixed and ready. Except it segfaults on amd64! I would appreciate some
> help here, because we need to have this version in Lenny IMO.
Still need help here.
> | Work in progress (2)
> | libgems-ruby #403407 wontfix
> | #485739
> | #448639
> | #405789
> | #466189
>
> All normal or wishlist bugs. Though, a few seem "important" to me, but ok.
> Two questions.
>
> 1. RubyGems 1.2.0 is not in Lenny, I think it should be? Or not?
> If so, we need an exception.
> 2. The libgems-ruby package doesn't seem to contain a 'rubygems' dummy
> package to depend on 'rubygems1.8'. Is this not a RC bug?
More bugreports were filed, mostly related to (2). This needs to
be addressed. I am sure it is a RC bug now (grave -> #495320).
> | liblocale-ruby I? #470798
>
> This bug should be severity "important". Antonio and I agree that the
> easiest solution would be to have it removed from Lenny and really solve
> it well for Lenny +1. Note that liblocale-ruby{,1.8} have no
> reverse depends.
The release time should be asked to remove it for Lenny.
> | libxtemplate-ruby1.8 I #472430
>
> Gotta work on this and straighten it out. Not much work though.
Handled by Gunnar and solved in Sid. A release block exception
should be requested.
> | ruby-gnome2 I #493063
>
> A recent important bug, haven't investigated it. May be inreproducible.
More grave/important bugs were filed! One of them is another
"objects creation during garbage collection phase" problem.
Sjoerd suggested that he has a few patches for this. These should be
applied and tested. Afterwards a release exception block should be
requested.
Finally, I have noticed there are a few packages of our that should get
a release block exception, but I haven't created a script to determine
which of our packages have a newer version in Sid w.r.t. Lenny. If
someone could do this and check if we need to request exceptions for
them (because they fix severity important or RC bugs), I would be
grateful.
Kind regards,
Paul
--
PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: paulvt at debian.org
University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: paul at luon.net
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
mailing list