[Pkg-xen-devel] Re: [Pkg-xen-changes] r3 - trunk

[Julien Danjou]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 05:58:27PM +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> shouldn't we use some smaller deb-revision than "-1" in the changelog as long 
> as we haven't really released it? And I think we will not release it within 
> some days.

No, it does not matter.
We can upload -120 if we think that our 120th release is ok to be
uploaded.

> first of all, because everybody that uses packages that are builded the 
> "pkg-xen" way will have already -1 installed and when it is really released 
> it might not be automaticly updated for those people.

People capable to do svn checkout and build their own package are not
silly, are they ? ;)

> I used "-0" + my revsion so that if some day "real" debian packages are 
> released nobody is confused about versioning. maybe we should use something 
> like "-0.5" or "0.9" for now.

I think it make sense if we release out from svn (means: if we upload to
unstable or experimental). Otherwise, this a non sens, I think.

And by the way, the x.y notation is used for NMU.

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060216/6031e832/attachment.pgp