[sane-devel] xsane efficiency problem?
Denis.Roegel at loria.fr
Denis.Roegel at loria.fr
Tue Oct 17 21:08:58 UTC 2006
Hello,
I recently upgraded an old linux (Red Hat as of 2001) to Ubuntu,
and with it I moved to a new sane/xsane. I have been very disappointed,
because my scanner (Epson Perfection 1240U) is now much slower
to handle. There are three problems:
1) I am losing a huge amount of time changing directories,
and this was so much simpler back in 2001; I can't see
why anyone would like the current scheme, except if
you are scanning only one or two pages in a month;
anybody with serious scanning needs will find the current
xsane defaults very annoying;
2) When previewing, the page area cannot be selected before
the scanner carried has moved back to its original position;
this wasn't so in the 2001 version of sane/xsane, and therefore
I consider that the current encoding is not enough efficient;
something has been lost between 2001 and 2006 and I would like
it to be restored; perhaps this has something to do with
threads, but the page area selection should not have to wait
until the carriage is back in place;
3) Once an page has been scanned, saving takes a lot of time;
this may already have been the case in the 2001 version,
but it wasn't a problem, because previewing could be
started right away; now, I have to wait a huge amount of time
for the save operation;
Please realize that all this concerns the same machine, with the
same scanner. Only xsane/sane (and linux) have been upgraded.
It should therefore be possible to go back to the former version.
Btw, can I install an old sane/xsane ?
Thanks,
D. Roegel
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list