[sane-devel] SANE2, time for a decision

Martin Owens doctormo at gmail.com
Sun Jan 7 20:04:51 CET 2007


Toy might want to look at Enlightened Absolutism; because democracy
doesn't work for software development. to inefficient.

If you want to develop a standard, do so; don't search for consensus
you only have to put it in public eyes for scrutiny, this doesn't stop
the development of driven people.

If it's required to fork to get the job done then do so. there is no
oligarchy here where a set of 'enlightened' developers are better than
everyone else because they've been doing it longer and are more
involved with sane so that some how affords them more rights (which it
doesn't) and ego and arrogance have no place in software development
either.

It's nice to think your in a special little club and that people can
either be under you or not involved but they don't work like that and
it's about time sane got it's act together and stop pissing in the
wind.

To conclude: Do what you have to, ignore the ego and the egocentrics.

Kind Regards, Martin Owens

On 07/01/07, Skorous <skorous at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think he meant that a small group of invested and motivated people
> would be able to make a lot faster progress rather than having to put
> every idea to a vote rather than saying that most people aren't
> qualified to participate. A republic vs. a democracy vs. benevolent
> dictatorship if you will.... ;-)
>
> On 1/6/07, m. allan noah <anoah at pfeiffer.edu> wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Oliver Rauch wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > The SANE2 standard is not finished, so it does not make sens to start coding
> > > SANE2. It would be a big mistake to start coding SANE2 at this point because
> > > the standard is not finished and will change.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I spent a lot of time in the SANE2 standard proposal. It took me a lot of
> > > energie and time to work out this proposal, but the following infinite and
> > > partly useless discussion about SANE2 (some years ago) made me stop my work
> > > on it.
> >
> > your insistence on having a completed standard prior to coding is exactly
> > what created your desire to stop. you gave those who disagreed with you
> > the power to halt your development. i was not involved with sane 5 years
> > ago when most of the discussions took place, but i daresay that if i had
> > arrived on the scene and found that you personally had already started
> > coding sane2 with modest consensus and a history of being flexible, i
> > would have helped you.
> >
> > instead, we find ourselves staring at a standard that is outdated
> > regarding many of the new ideas that have come along in the last 4 years,
> > and any time someone tries to start up a discussion, they get told to hold
> > their horses cause the standard is not done?
> >
> > in the absense of a strong leader to direct things (no torvalds here), i
> > am willing to bet that we need some running code BEFORE the rough
> > consensus :)
> >
> > > The standard is not ready for coding, but we can finish it shortly, the major
> > > part is done. But it is only possible when we create a little group (3-5
> > > backend and frontend programmers) that discuss and improve the standard
> > > proposal NON PUBLIC - or we will get the infinite discussion again.
> >
> > that is the most insulting suggestion that i have heard lately. only some
> > people on this list are qualified for the continuing discussion of sane2?
> > that the public only gets 1-2 weeks to comment?
> >
> > i am not nearly as good a programmer as you guys, but even i can see some
> > need for changes to the standard draft. the fact that prior discussions
> > got 'heated' (i dont know, i have not read them all) does not mean they
> > will again. that is, as long as the folks who put time into the current
> > draft are not afraid to see it change...
> >
> > allan
> >
> > --
> > "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know.
> > money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
> >
> > --
> > sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> >              to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
>
> --
> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>              to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>



More information about the sane-devel mailing list