[Debian-med-packaging] mcl 22-282

Stijn van Dongen micans at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 10:26:28 GMT 2022


Hi Andreas,

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:47 AM Andreas Tille <andreas at fam-tille.de> wrote:

> > Would it be tremendously useful if I reversed this change in a subsequent
> > release, or would it imply just more work?
>
> I admit if it would be contained upstream and thus we have the good
> feeling that it is supposed to work with latest mcl this would be
> helpful.  There is no need to hurry, thought, since we solved the
> issue with a copy of the old version.
>

That's basically what I would do, so it should be fine. The exchange
formats for mcl are very stable,
and this is the only thing that mclblastline really needs.


> > In general, feel free to get in touch if that's useful of course, I'm
> happy
> > to receive feedback and suggestions.
>
> I admit we have way more severe problems with loosing the OCaml patch
> we included in version 14.  This has three reverse depends we lost
> now and since we have nobody with knowledge in OCaml we have no idea
> how to solve this.
>

I know someone who has some interest in OCaml, I'll drop them a line on the
off-chance.

Thanks,
Stijn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/attachments/20221206/3be2b1ef/attachment.htm>


More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list