[pkg-bacula-devel] New versions upload

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 25.07.2012 08:41, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 20120724 om 21:35 schreef Alexander Golovko:
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:14:10 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 21:10:49 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
>> >
>> }> Upstream position 5.2.x releases as bugfixes, 5.2.7 and 5.2.10 as
>> }> significant bugfix releases.
>> >> There is a debdiff between current packages and new 5.2.10, which
>> >> after fixing all regressions and other bugs can be uploaded:
>> >>
>> > We're interested in the source diff, not so much binary.
>> >
>>
>> i use next command for create debdiff:
>> debdiff --diffstat --exclude bacula.pot --exclude '*.po' \
>> --exclude configure --exclude ltdl.m4 --exclude 
>> fix-binutils-gold-linking.patch
>> --wdiff-source-control bacula_5.2.6+dfsg-2.dsc 
>> bacula_5.2.10+dfsg-1.dsc > bacula-dsc-debdiff.txt
>
>     ( haven't checked the debdiff output )

It doesn't sound like you're in a position to comment on its 
suitability then?

> FWIW from http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=news
>   The 5.2.10 version is a significant bug fix release

How many of those fixes fit the acceptance criteria?  This:

> including our first cut of AFS support.

certainly doesn't.

Regards,

Adam