[pkg-bacula-devel] 9.6.7 or 11.0.x for Bullseye?

[Mario Pranjic]

On 12/9/20 7:30 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> At the current moment, my proposal is to aim for 9.6.7 for Bullseye,
> keeping 11.0.x in experimental and providing it for Bullseye via
> Backports, as we have done with 9.6.x for Buster.
>
I think that is the best approach too.
In that sense, that bacula-libs3 is actual for Debian 11?

Best regards,

--
Mario.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20201209/1beab442/attachment.sig>